Home
About Us
History
Mission / Values
Contact Us
Photo Gallery
What We Do
Fire Suppression
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Prevention
Community Services
Volunteer Program
How Do I?
Community Services
Lock Box Program
Car Seat Loaner Program
Smoke Detector Program
Community Education Programs
Maricopa County Services
Adult Protective Services
Links to Other Agencies
Auxiliary & Charities
Sun City Fire Department Auxiliary
Sun City Firefighters Charities
100 Club
Toys For Tots
Salvation Army
- Select -
- Home
About Us
- History
- Mission / Values
- Contact Us
- Photo Gallery
What We Do
- Fire Suppression
- Emergency Medical Services
- Fire Prevention
- Community Services
- Volunteer Program
How Do I?
Community Services
Lock Box Program
- Car Seat Loaner Program
- Smoke Detector Program
- Community Education Programs
- Maricopa County Services
- Adult Protective Services
- Links to Other Agencies
Auxiliary & Charities
Sun City Fire Department Auxiliary
- Sun City Firefighters Charities
- 100 Club
- Toys For Tots
- Salvation Army
SCFMD EMS Evaluation
SCFMD EMS Evaluation
Name
*
Employee Number
*
Email
*
CEP or EMT
*
Date of First Review
Employee Rating
EMS Personnel Evaluations will be completed by the EMS personnel in July of each year using the Scoring Matrix. The evaluation will be returned to the EMS Personnel’s Officer (Capt.). The Officer and the EMS Personnel will meet to review and discuss the scoring of each question. After reviewing the completed form, the EMS Personnel, with the Officers assistance, will establish goals for the rest of the year and document them in the appropriate location. Both parties will sign the form in the July section (checkbox). The Officer will retain the original and the EMS Personnel will be provided a copy to refer to over the next nine months.
Knowledge of Job Functions, SOGs, Procedures, Policies and Facilities
The employee’s knowledge and application of that knowledge as they perform their assigned duties and responsibilities both in the station and at emergency scenes.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Operates safely and within SOGs
Employee consistently performs job functions safely and in accordance with the department’s medical protocols, standard operating guidelines, rules, and regulations.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Leadership and Teamwork
Employee consistently demonstrates leadership skills and performs their role in a constructive and professional manner and displays a commitment to the team concept.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Work Ethic
Employee consistently completes daily duties, apparatus check, reports, training, PCR and EMS functions thoroughly and completely.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Attitude and Professional Communications skills
Employee Consistently displays pride in the department and a positive attitude towards their work, colleagues, supervisors, and the public they serve. Employee maintains open communications and effectively works through conflicts.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Preparedness for duty
Employee arrives at work in appropriate uniform, which is neat and clean. Employee’s gear is out and prepared at the beginning of the shift.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Commitment to professional development
Employee consistently strives to improve skills and knowledge through continual education and training above and beyond the department required minimum standards. Employee maintains licenses and certifications.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Self-motivation
Employee is self-motivated and self-directed. Employee consistently looks for productive things to do without supervision.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Customer Service
Employee clearly understands and consistently delivers outstanding customer service to the public we serve.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Organizational Commitment
Consistently delivers quality internal customer service to the employees and members, while actively participating and supporting the District.
5 Excellent
4 Good
3 Fair
2 Needs Improvement
1 Unacceptable
Comments (July)
Goals (July)
EMS: Consent (E-Signature)
*
I agree that the check of this box represents my signature.
The parties acknowledge and agree that this evaluation may be executed by checkbox consent, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.
Date
*
Supervisor's Name
*
Andersen, Thomas P
Archer, Eric T
Aschebrock, Cody R
Ashford, Dustin W
Bebee, Rodney W
Brown, Kevin D
Campos, Elizabeth
Carroll, Daniel M
Casey, Jason P
Chamberlain, Bryan L
Clark, Christopher G
Cogsdill, Adam M
Cooper, Brian J
Cruz, Nicholas M
Deadman, Ronald R
Dykstra, Richard J
Farrar, Damon C
Flesher Jr., James P
Fox, Jim
Gaut, Christopher P
Giamundo, Anne M
Gillaspy, Dale E
Godbehere, Shane M
Godleski, Michael A
Gustafson, Adam A
Hayes, Rich W
Holliday, Adam M
Holzer, Drew E
Hood-Neeley, Sherry A
Kelley, David M
Kovac, Kenneth M
La Barbera, Nathan P
Lanham, Joshua D
Levandowski, Francis E
Lohr, Matthew H
Lucking, Matthew R
Lumbardo , Adam R
Malin, Scott M
Mann, David A
Marin, Christopher M
Marquez, Taylor C
McClure, Kolton L
McElroy, Chris C
Murphy Jr, Kenneth W
Musselman, David A
Neal, Paul R
Netzel, Kyle B
Neubert, Lisa B
O'Farrell, Michael A
O'Reilly, Matthew J
Ohrt, Frederick P
Ortega, Steven M
Peck, Derek A
Perez, Theresa M.
Perreault, George A
Rivas, Richard C
Rivas, Zaid P
Roe , Steven C
Salkeld , Jeff A
Sandoval, Jesus M
Sapp, Bryan W
Schall, Matthew J
Schmitz, Robert J
Shedler, John W
Soto, Jamie P
Stockwell, Bradly M
Taylor, Shon D
Thompson, Jeremiah D
Thompson, Jerry
Tirman, Randall M
Van Roekel, Tony D
Van, Steven
Yates, Zachary A
Officer: Consent (E-Signature)
*
I have reviewed the evaluation and agree that the check of this box represents my signature.
The parties acknowledge and agree that this evaluation may be executed by checkbox consent, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.
Date
*